Another iffy police outfit calls around Seattle

iffy police outfitThe caller to the New To Seattle world headquarters was Nathan. At least that’s the name he gave. He solicited money for the Washington State Law Enforcement Association, which he said did all kinds of good things for public safety and the citizens of Washington State. He pushed hard to get me to commit to a $15 pledge. I pushed back by asking questions.

As some of Nathan’s answers were slightly off kilter, highly repetitive or delayed, I quickly realized he was another of those computer-controlled interactive characters who occasionally call asking for money. I think Nathan, or his human supervisor secretly monitoring the call, got on to me, too. He/they soon stopped asking for money and hung up.

Regular visitors to the space know what happened next. I started poking around the Internet, looking for documents to see what I could learn about WSLEA.

I learned a lot. The biggest takeaway was this: By its very own admission, less than 4% of what WSLEA spent in the latest year for which I could find filings related directly to its stated mission of helping law enforcement. The main reason for this: A whopping 83% of the money raised by Nathan and any fellow digital dialers got siphoned off by their paid telemarketing overlords, based in far-away Minnesota.

To put this another way (and rounding), of every dollar given by folks like you, 83 cents went straight to a professional fundraiser, 8 cents went for WSLEA’s management and certain overhead, and 5 cents was put in the bank. That left just 4 cents of your dollar to help fight the criminal element of Washington State.

The 45-year-old WSLEA, which despite its important- and official-sounding name seems to be a private organization not part of any government, lists a post office box in the state capital of Olympia and another office in the Seattle suburb of Newcastle. WSLEA strikes me as a rather iffy police outfit, not unlike the National Police and Trooper Association, which also has called me and which also I have written about. These financial efficiency ratios are simply terrible (although I’ve seen worse).

But WSLEA’s Web site is full of even stranger stuff. For instance, on a page entitled Newsletter, the latest publication is from 2000–14 years ago, when Bill Clinton was still president. The online calendar–which the home page says will help people “stay informed on all member and training events, and see what is coming up”–lists no events that I could see other than board meetings for the past dozen years or the next 14 years.

Is WSLEA admitting to no future? That might not be so surprising, since the tax return explicitly said it had no employees or even volunteers.

Most of the data I’m analyzing here comes from WSLEA’s public federal tax return for 2012, downloadable from here. By now, there ought to be a public tax return out for 2013, but I couldn’t locate it. By email I requested a copy from WSLEA, which, unlike many nonprofit organization, does not routinely post its tax returns or financial results on its Web site.

I haven’t heard back yet from WSLEA. It’s not hard to imagine why not.

Again rounding, for 2012 WSLEA raised $459,000 by calling Washington State residents like me (plus another $1,000 in dues from members). Some $382,000 went to the callers, which filings in the state capital Olympia identified as Community Safety LLC and Safety Service Inc., also known as Safety Services and SSI. Both paid telemarketers share an office suite in Medicine Lake, Minn., and are likely affiliated with each other. Another $35,000 was spent on WSLEA management, certain overhead, and–at $12,000, the largest single itemized category–travel.

WSLEA’s own tax return stated that of a total of $433,000 spent, just $16,000 was in furtherance of its stated mission.That worked out to a charitable commitment ratio of 3.7%, which is considerably less than the 65% charity watchdogs say should be the lowest acceptable minimum. Now, 3.7% rounds to 4%, which is the number, based on results for 2013, listed by the Washington State Secretary of State’s Office.

Of that $16,000, $11,000 was listed as “scholarship and awards,” $3,500 as “donations” and $1,400 as “advertising and promotion.”

You might wonder exactly what WSLEA, to which contributions are not tax-deductible, does besides providing a nice living for fundraisers. There seems to be a gap between words and deeds.

On its tax returns and in its constitution, WSLEA declares “education” as its primary purpose.  But it was a little hard to see that even in the miniscule $16,000 of stated expenses for 2012. While $11,000 was listed for “scholarships and awards,” the scholarship page of the Web site says only two $750.00 scholarships for college students were awarded that year.

WSLEA’s latest annual filing for 2013 with Washington State regulators, which I obtained from Olympia, was even squishier when it came to describing the purpose or mission. “The Association provides information about educational opportunities for law enforcement members and supports a variety of community programs,” WSLEA wrote. To me, “information about educational opportunities” amounts to very little.

As always, I invite comment below from anyone mentioned or just interested in these issues. That certainly would include WSLEA. And, of course, Nathan, assuming he and his human master are programmed properly.

Follow William P. Barrett’s work on Twitter by clicking here.

Share on Facebook


Another iffy police outfit calls around Seattle — 9 Comments

  1. Thank you for your article. i was going to send in my 15.00 but when I received the envelope it was from a Donor processing center in Wisconson. I don’t like the sound of it, I would rather donate to my city and county police on their next drive.

    • Before you give money to any nonprofit, ask for a copy of the nonprofit’s latest tax return or financial statement and read it. If you can’t understand it, ask a knowledgeable friend to help you. This is especially true if you’re consideration a donation to a police or law enforcement organization. Many have dreadful financial efficiency numbers, like most of the money goes to an outside fundraiser and very little goes to what you might consider a proper charitable purpose.

  2. Hey! I worked for these guys back in maybe… 2008? It was one of my first jobs, and I was one of maybe 3 people out of 40 in the office with no criminal record. In fact, half the office was on a prison work release program. Safety Services, in Spokane Valley.

    We didn’t use recordings at that time, it was lines of callers talking to people. Just hit the spacebar and the autodialer will connect you to the next victim. We did have a few guys that acted like robots on the phone, partly because that got them the most pledges, and partly because they were so fuckin stoned all day.

    So in my experience, you weren’t talking to a robot, just a guy tripping balls, and he hung up when it was clear you weren’t falling for it.

  3. I received a pledge invoice for $30, and a reminder notice a few weeks later. Since I didn’t remember pledging anything, I compared the “pledge date” to my calendar and can say for certain I was gone from 6:30 am until at least 8:00 pm, and would NOT have answered the phone when I got home!!

  4. I got “Pledge” mailer from the WSLEA today, saying to remit (by 11/17/14)the $15.00 I pledged on 11/3/14. Nope, never made that pledge and my phone records can prove it. I’m sending the mailer back alright, with no payment. I will however, inlcude a “nastygram.”

    • I rather doubt that the WSLEA–or rather, its paid fundraisers–is going to make a stink over a claimed $15 pledge. But if you get back a response, let me know, and perhaps I’ll write again about the organization.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.