Charity trolling in Seattle is sued for fraud by a donor

charity trollingThis could get interesting.

A Florida lawyer who got a telephone call asking for money on behalf of a charity frequently criticized in this space has filed a small-clams-court lawsuit alleging fraud and deceptive practices.

The civil lawsuit by St. Petersburg lawyer Matthew D. Weidner names Breast Cancer Research and Support Fund; its parent unit, Community Charity Advancement, of Pompano Beach, Fla.; and something called The Fundraising Center. The action, which alleges “furtherance of a fraudulent charitable solicitation scheme,” was filed on August 14 in the Small Claims Division of Pinellas County Court and carries the case number 15-006598-SC.

I sent a request for comment about the lawsuit to BCRSF/CCA through its website and will update this if I hear back. Based on my past experience with this charity, that’s not too likely.

Three times I have nominated BCRSF/CCA for my list of America’s Stupidest Charities. Why? Its paid telemarketers kept calling the New To Seattle world headquarters asking for money despite previous negative write-ups (click herehere and here).

Why the previous negative write-ups? According to the charity’s own filings, 82% of the cash raised went for fundraising. (In 2014 that figure rose to 87%, according to data in a handwritten filing the charity just sent to the North Carolina Secretary of State’s Office). Only 1% of that cash went toward breast cancer research or breast cancer support, which a casual (or uninformed) donor might think is the major purpose of a charity using the name Breast Cancer Research and Support Fund. Moreover, the charity on its website falsely claimed affiliations with at least one reputable medical institution, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, here in Seattle.

In you were wondering, BCRSF/CCA is not part of the pending civil lawsuit that the Federal Trade Commission and all state attorneys general brought in May alleging fraud against Cancer Fund of America, Cancer Support Services, Breast Cancer Society and Children’s Cancer Fund of America. These four are run by the Reynolds family of Knoxville, Tenn. Control of BCRSF/CCA–founded just a few years ago as Seven Sisters of Healing Inc., with no mention of cancer in its original charitable mission–remains murky.

According to the suit, on August 12 at 9:34 a.m., Weidner received a call on his cell phone. “A prerecorded female voice began speaking identifying herself as an agent of the ‘Breast Cancer Research and Support Fund” and asking for money, the complaint says. “At some point after the monologue began it became apparent that the voice was a prerecorded script because the voice would not respond to inquiries or questions.” (In my experience, the voice is computer controlled but monitored by a real human and capable of answering some basic questions.)

Following the call, the complaint said, Weidner called the number on his cell phone’s caller ID and got a message identifying the number as one belonging to The Fundraising Center. (Again in my experience, fundraising calls from BCRSF/CCA came from Courtesy Call Inc. of Las Vegas.) Weidner then found the charity’s website, which lists many prominent cancer institutions as “program partners” or recipient of research grants. Weider wrote that he “suspects that these reputable institutions are not in fact affiliated in any way with the Defendants and that their identity is being used in furtherance of a fraudulent charitable solicitation scheme.”

Weidner filed his lawsuit just two days later. He cited three claims for relief:

–Violation of the Federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. 227, which generally prohibits “using any automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice” to call a cell phone or a home landline. That law, however, contains an exemption for calls “by a tax-exempt nonprofit organization.”

–Violation of Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, because the BCRSF/CCA website lists about 20 “well-regarded institutions” as “program partners” or recipient of research support, including Seattle Cancer Care Alliance. “Any contributions that would be made would not in fact be directed toward legitimate charitable purposes,” the complaint states.

–Fraud. “The representations made during the telephone solicitation that money provided to the Defendants would be used to research cancer treatments and care for cancer patients was not  a true statement of fact,” the complaint said.

Weidner’s lawsuit seeks unspecified money damages. Since the maximum award in Florida small claims courts is just $5,000, the single lawsuit by itself has no big-bucks potential. In a telephone call today, Weidner told me that to establish standing, or the legal right to sue, he made a $10.00 contribution–arguably the extent of his individual damages–and is already out of pocket the $320.00 filing fee.

However, as a “consumer justice” lawyer, Weidner is clearly trolling for business himself. “When you’re called by strange numbers, DO NOT IGNORE THOSE CALLS,” he just wrote on the blog of his law firm’s website. “Answer the call, and then take down detailed notes, AND THEN CALL ME! So we can file a lawsuit like the one I filed.” In another post, Weidner, who alerted me to his lawsuit, linked to one of my New To Seattle essays.

Weidner told me today his goal is to shut down BCRSF/CCA through multiple small lawsuits that have to be defended by spending money on lawyers. “Death by a thousand cuts,” he declared.

Like I said, this could get interesting.

Follow William P. Barrett’s work on Twitter by clicking here.

Share on Facebook


Charity trolling in Seattle is sued for fraud by a donor — 9 Comments

  1. While the scams should stop this is deplorable by a lawyer to donate $10 just to have standing to sue someone. It is INCREDIBLY shady tactic to gain business by this lawyer and cause a legal court battle intentionally; which is against all ethics the courts stand for.

  2. I got a robo call from this charity today. It started by asking for “Debra” which is not my name, then asked me for a donation. When I said I’d rather check their website it directed me to I did a little googling on this and came to your blog. Thanks for the tip!

  3. Just received the same call, but it was local number 206-693-4346. I said I was looking them up and with a short period of silence, the voice said, thank you anyway. Then I said wait, don’t you want a contribution? And the auto voice said that there were three levels and when Ininyerrupted, the call was ended by them.
    Hope this helps. Calling KOMO re: the whole set up of this “charity.”

  4. If more people would do research before donating to charities they’ve never heard of, these bogus organizations would disappear. I too received the call described above and pledged a small amount to get off the phone call. I experienced the same odd interaction with the other party indicating a pre-recorded message. All it took was one Google search before I wrote the check to verify my suspicions were confirmed. Great article, keep spreading the word!

  5. Nice meeting you last night Bill. I’ve been scrolling through your blogs and fell upon this one. I had just shared with my 18 year old son about being a good steward with your donation money. He chose to donate some of his summer money to CARE. I encouraged him to make sure that the people he chooses to receive his money are worthy of it. Very worthy article!

    • Dan, CARE USA has a brand name it wants to protect, and it enjoys a clean rating from the BBB Wise Giving Alliance. Not so for many of these tiny cancer and other single-interest charities. BCRSF/CCA is one of the worst.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.